This review article, published in 2014, serves as a bridge document connecting the earlier foundational work on CO₂ and orthostatic physiology to contemporary understanding. It is not a primary study but a synthesis, and that is exactly what makes it useful. It explains, clearly and in sequence, why CO₂ is not a peripheral finding in orthostatic intolerance but a central driver of the cerebrovascular response to standing.
CO₂ is one of the most potent regulators of cerebral vessel tone in the body. When CO₂ rises, cerebral blood vessels dilate and blood flow increases. When CO₂ falls, cerebral blood vessels constrict and blood flow decreases. This is not subtle. A drop of 10 mmHg in end-tidal CO₂ can reduce cerebral blood flow velocity by 20 to 30 percent. In a person who is already experiencing reduced cerebral perfusion from the mechanical challenge of upright posture, hyperventilation-induced hypocapnia creates a compounding problem.
The review argues that capnography, the continuous measurement of exhaled CO₂, should be part of any serious orthostatic evaluation. It provides a physiological rationale that any clinician can follow, without requiring specialized equipment beyond what many labs already have. The fact that this argument still needs to be made in routine clinical settings in 2025 is itself informative about how slowly testing standards evolve.
For patients trying to advocate for more thorough evaluation, this paper provides a logical framework. The question to bring to a clinician is not just what did my heart rate do but what was my CO₂ doing, and what was my brain blood flow doing while that was happening.
Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 — Website by @autonomicdrama